Saturday, March 20, 2010

Bending rules and flamboyance

Ha! Didn't think there would be words of wisdom relevant to my teaching of music analysis coming from My Paper Executive Look 2010, but I was wrong! Chanced upon two surprise finds:

i. "Before you can even attempt to bend the rules, you've got to learn them so well that you don't even have to think about it, it'll be reactive." ('best advice" shared by Senior Training Consultant, Louie Tai, 18 Mar 2010)

I'm sure all those past masters who pushed musical boundaries in their music compositions must have already similarly internalized the rules, even if subconsciously/intuitively, when they broke new grounds with their rule-bending or even rule-breaking.

ii. "Marry the flamboyance of a marketeer with the technical rationality of a professional -- Be technically sound, and be able to sell that knowledge." ("best advice" shared by tax consultant, Scott Chen, 16 Mar 2010)

I would aspire to that! Technical competence is important to any teacher, but equally the ability to 'sell' your wares to the students.

Labels:

Sunday, August 09, 2009

Good teachers, bad teachers

Heard a BBC radio interview with Anthony Horowitz yesterday. On the influence of teachers on youngsters, he said something like "A bad teacher spoils your day, a good teacher makes your life." Teaching music theory/analysis should ideally make a musician.

Labels:

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

"The worst crime"

In the latest issue of Eastman Notes (Winter 2009), Stephen Hough told the interviewer:

"The fun thing about playing is alerting a person to something special, to stimulating the brains of your audience. If there is anything predictable about your recital, from the pieces you play to the way you play them, I think that is the worst crime."

How true this is of music analysis! I recall how great analyses opened my eyes/ears to wonderful things in the music which I was previously unaware of, or they gave me a different pair of ears to listen to a familiar piece differently. Whichever the case, the experiences are often intellectually stimulating and, equally importantly, aesthetically enriching: I came away feeling mentally energized and wanting to go play or listen to the piece.

I should aim to teach music analysis with similar goals as Hough does in his piano performances.

Labels:

Monday, February 16, 2009

Art and taste

Adena Portowitz's discussion of "Art and Taste in Mozart's Sonata-Rondo Finales" (Journal of Musicology, 2001) made me think, once again, of my teaching. He quotes Haydn's oft-cited remark to Mozart's father: "your son ... has taste and also the greatest knowledge of composition". On a different occasion, Dittersdorf remarked similarly of Mozart as a performer: "Clementi's playing is art simply and solely: Mozart's combines art and taste". How true it is that we need both the technical fluency and that elusive thing called taste: great artists like Haydn recognized that, great artists like Mozart have that!

Coincidentally, I've just been playing and analyzing Haydn's Adagio from his Piano Sonata in Ab, Hob XVI:46. Such a beautiful movement in which Haydn ingeniously combines elements of a ground bass with sonata form together with such other antico techniques as canon (which one hardly notices). The expressive power of suspensions (transcending 4th species counterpoint) and the commonplace trills are both exquisitely woven into the music fabric which is constantly changing, giving the movement its unique overall shape within a sonata form framework. His harmonies--tonicizations, mixtures, chromatic sequences, juxtaposed with moments of harmonic simplicity--draw me in such that I don't want to leave his beautifully-designed harmonic labyrinth. What Haydn said of Mozart could well apply to himself!

Which brings me back to my starting point: teaching my students counterpoint and partwriting is only the beginning (the art side, or more appropriately, the craft), hopefully they cultivate their sense of musical tastes in the process too!

Labels:

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Wang Jian Min's masterclass

What a coincidence that JR had just analyzed mainland Chinese composer Wang Jian Min's 1st Erhu Rhapsody (王建民 之 第一二胡狂想曲)this semester and the composer came to Singapore to judge the Singapore National Chinese Music Competition and gave a composition masterclass. I went to the session with much eagerness, wanting to hear him talk about composing first-hand. What great initial disappointment it was when he announced that he didn't think it would be appropriate to conduct a composition masterclass in the context of this competition, instead, he would offer some guidance to performers playing his pieces. Fortunately, I did not then walked out, for his ensuing comments for the three performers revealed much about his thinking as a composer and how he hears music.

The first thing that struck a strong resonance in me was when he essentially echoed what Perahia had recently emphasized--the importance of expressing and shaping the music based on an understanding of the imagery or emotions evoked by the music. As he commented on different sections of the music, he was relating emotions to visual imageries, at times pointing to specific folk elements (e.g. the call-and-response of lovers in Mountain Songs 山歌, the sentiments 情怀of a peasant girl, particular tribal dances, etc). The overall shaping of the music was also important to him, especially when (as he said) he deliberately avoided the stereotypical ABA form and opted for multisectional organization. In particular, he called on the performers to give more thoughts on how to shape the many 散板 (metrically freer) passages that he uses in the introduction (引子) or transitions (衔接处).

The second thing which naturally caught my attention was his emphasis that the performer should at least know something about the composer's basic compositional materials. On his 1st Erhu Rhapsody, he revealed that its basic material is drawn from a very specific folk sources (he was not satisfied with the Erhu player's general reference to Yunnan)--the 飞歌 of the 苗族, a minority tribe in Yunnan (for other folk inspiration, see JR's blog). In this case, it is not a particular folk tune but a general musical feature: as manifested in this piece, it is D-F sharp-A with F-natural as a kind of altered note (变音). As JR had discovered, this four-note motive permeates the entire piece in different guises. What dawned on me was a subtle but important music-cultural difference in perspective: in set-theoretic terms, it is an (0347) where the two notes that form the maj/min third are implicitly equal and may be heard as evoking mixture; but Wang's explanation was more along the lines of Chinese traditional concepts of scale, writing on the board D-F sharp -A first, then speaking of the F-natural as a 变音. I should find out more about the Chinese concept here to see how it compares with the western concept of chromatic note. Certainly, it is his frequent melodic pairing of the two notes that distinguishes it from Western practices and gives this piece its characteristic colouring.

In wrapping up his masterclass, he reiterated that for him, there is no one definitive interpretation of his music: he sees the possibility of other viewpoints, different from his own, as long as these interpretations are logical and coherent (and, I suppose, musical engaging--since throughout the masterclass, his concern for the performer engaging the listener came across very strongly). For him, the space 空间 for creativity even in interpretation is very important. I think he would probably extend this space to analytical interpretation; I'm sure he'd be happy to see performers and analysts alike making sense of his multisectional organization (i.e. going beyond mere labelling and identifying of key/pitch centres)

Finally, I was much impressed by his depth of musical thinking AND hearing, which were at the same time anchored by a down-to-earth awareness of and ability to speak to the young music learners he was addressing. He knew when to elicit immediate changes from the performers and when to simply sow the seed. This was certainly great pedagogy in action--reaching down without talking down.

Oh yes, I almost forgot a profound observation he left with the audience: our Chinese music performance standard was very impressive, very promising, however, our performers were perhaps generally too prim and proper, t0o well brought up (太乖了), that's not good for performance and creativity (it's good to break a string sometimes, he told the guzheng player at one point).Well, it's good to be wild sometimes. :)

Labels: ,

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Thank you, Mr Perahia!

Dear Mr Perahia,

This is an open letter to you.

I've just come away from your piano masterclass this morning at YST conservatory, it was most inspiring--that goes without saying, really--but more than that, I was even more thrilled to hear you affirm one of the central beliefs in my own teaching--namely, the importance of learning harmony and counterpoint to understand tonal music. This message was certainly beautifully illustrated with the Chopin and Beethoven examples.

And you went beyond that--for you, all these technical understanding (and likewise all the piano techniques) serve a greater end. This was when you took us, with Beethoven's example, from the 'starry sky' to the 'moral within us'. The crown of the jewel here--for me, that is--was when you cautioned that any programmatic interpretation of music must be grounded on an informed understanding of the composer and his music. So, with one stroke of the wand, you've set the eyes of both piano students and musicians who spend hours analyzing music on a higher, more inspiring plane.

As I recalled my ex-professor telling us that you won't play a piece of music until you have analyzed it (and I think he said) using Schenkerian analyses, I wondered if I should ask you about it. But of course, before I could ask my question, you were already talking about shaping in music and, lo and behold! you went to the piano and illustrated Schenker's Ursatz, even including a Schenkerian interruption, with your Beethoven and Mozart examples--all these, without mentioning Schenker's name, which might have alienated some of the audience. I don't know whether you studied with Carl Schachter at Mannes College, but you sure have grasped the essence of Schenker's profound insight!

So, thank you again, Mr Perahia, for lending your voice to my teaching!

Yours humbly,
ec

Labels: ,